In response to this from Brian:
twilight is a phenomenon I don't think males can properly comprehend. my lady read, in this order: the first three twilight books, in defense of food, last twilight book, the fountainhead, and the entire twilight series again.
My friend Jeff and I were talking about Twilight and he said that his roommate Arash explained the Twilight phenomenon to him as 'porn for chicks'. Not sure if Arash came up with the idea on his own or if he overheard it, but I think it makes sense.
What he means is that the Twilight books meet a need in their female audience in the same way that porn meets a need in men. Whatever it is in the twilight books that makes girls go nuts for it, they're not getting it anywhere else (that I'm aware of), so credit to Meyer for being able to package that up and deliver it on the printed page. And they keep coming back to it (which is the amazing part).
You might think it's a pile of steaming shit (as I do), but your girl probably thinks the same thing about Playboy. So in that context I think it's possible to understand Twilight very well.
Unrelated: I love this jam. The video is a bit much but whatever. Open it in a different tab and just let the magic wash over you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
my ex girl subscribed to playboy...what does that say?
Wait just a second here! Let me see if understand... i was: a) just outed to b) be informed i am not adequately meeting my lady's needs. That is fucking funny.
It's not that you aren't meeting your lady's needs. It's that this need (if that's what it is) can only be met by this thing. It's like sugar. Or crack.
Post a Comment